JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 15, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Gladis Guerrero De Fuentes

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Administrativo De Bolivar Y El Juzgado De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Cartagena. Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Cartagena
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Superintendencia De Servicios Publicos
  • Conocimiento por jueces del circuito o con categoría de tales
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por la ciudadana Gladis Guerrero de Fuentes, al Juzgado de Ejecucion de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad de Cartagena, al que inicialmente le fue repartida, para que la tramite y decida sin mas dilacion.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.